Future space lawyers and students, government contractors and federal employees gathered Sept. 6 to discuss space law and policy — including federal regulators, contracting processes and lobbying, among other topics — at Arizona State University’s Barbara Barrett and Sandra Day O’Connor Washington Center.
The first-ever Navigating Space Law and Policy Bootcamp was hosted by the Association of Commercial Space Professionals (ACSP), an organization founded by ASU alum Bryce Kennedy, a graduate of Thunderbird School of Global Management’s Executive Master of Global Management: Space Leadership, Business, and Policy inaugural degree program.
The goal of ACSP
Kennedy and Bailey Reichelt, co-founder of ACSP, kicked off the bootcamp by explaining the purpose of the event and ACSP’s goals. Reichelt emphasized promoting the understanding of federal regulations when navigating the space industry as one of the key goals of ACSP.
“We need everyone to have access to this basic regulatory information. They need to be able to grow their businesses with as few hurdles as possible coming from the government,” said Reichelt. “From that idea, we decided the way that we democratize access to space, and that is ASCP’s mission.”
She added that perceived hurdles should not prevent interested parties from pursuing activities in the industry.
“Especially in the space industry, there’s not always a clear path forward. And that’s why we’re here today having this bootcamp. Sometimes there’s not a path, and that doesn’t mean the answer is no. It means you have to create a path,” Reichelt said.
The roles of FCC, FAA, NOAA and others
Caryn Schenewerk — space law and policy expert and president of CS Consulting, a space law and policy consulting company — and Laura Cummings — regulatory affairs counsel for Astroscale U.S., which provides satellite life-extension and on-orbit services for commercial operators and governments — presented on the roles of federal regulators in space travel and activities.
Schenewerk began with a summary of existing international laws used for regulating space, including the Outer Space Treaty; the Rescue of Astronauts Agreement, which applies to both astronauts and physical property; the Space Liability Convention; the Registration Convention; the Moon Agreement; and the International Telecommunication Union.
She noted that many of these laws are difficult to enforce and have not been agreed to by all space-faring countries, but many of them have also not yet needed to be enforced.
“I think, so far, the challenge of getting to space has been its own enforcement mechanism. It certainly has managed to kind of keep a lid on some of these problems,” said Schenewerk. “There’s also a lot of visibility so far as to what happens in space and how it happens. So, there’s a lot of accountability by virtue of transparency.”
She then summarized the role of federal regulators in spaceflight activities, beginning with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which regulates commercial spaceflight activities until a space vessel reaches orbit. She noted that the FAA is not responsible for regulating maritime vessels that support space activities, which are instead governed by the U.S. Coast Guard, and that once the vessel is in orbit, it is regulated by the Federal Communications Commission and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Schenewerk said it's key to understand which regulators are needed to approve each step of spaceflight and the differences between the United States and other countries in this regard.
“One of the things that’s an interesting aspect of the way that we govern our space activities is, as you’ll see today, we have different agencies that do different aspects of the space activity. Other countries have it set up as a one-stop shop,” she said.
Cummings focused on the role of telecommunications regulations in space travel and satellite use. She described the role of the Commercial Remote Sensing Regulatory Affairs (CRSRA) office within NOAA, which regulates remote sensing in space and licenses satellite imagery systems.
She noted an important exemption to this called the “mission assurance exemption,” which allows companies to take satellite images without a license if they are necessary to the mission.
“If you have a camera on board that you’re like, ‘I’m not trying to see the Rockies. I just want to make sure that my solar panel deploys,’ usually you fall under an exemption,” Cummings said. “You do not need an authorization from CRSRA.”
NASA and civil space
NASA Deputy Chief Financial Officer Steve Shinn presented on the role of the agency in space regulations. He described NASA’s acquisitions process and recent changes that have been made to streamline the process and promote accountability for projects.
“We’re not afraid to put in the real cost to do some of these missions,” Shinn said. “And if it does run into issues, we do have real confirmation reviews (and) confirmation hearings, to ultimately lead to cancellation if necessary.”
He added that NASA’s contracts now feature milestone trigger points to help recognize when a contract is struggling or succeeding.
Shinn explained how federal agencies do business with each other through the Economy Act and the Space Act, and various roles in NASA’s acquisitions and integrations.
“You get into all kinds of appropriations laws that one agency is prohibited from augmenting the appropriate of another agency,” he said. “Within that, there are times when it makes sense for two government agencies to collaborate or for one to help build something for one another.”
As an example, he added that NASA does business with the U.S. Department of Commerce through the Economy Act building NOAA weather satellites.
On the Space Act, which allows NASA to do business with private, local and educational institutions, Shinn said, “The Space Act is a set of legally enforceable promises between NASA and whomever that partner is that your goods and services will be exchanged. It can be performed by NASA, for that entity. Government officials can again commit those Space Act resources, and again, this Space Act must be consistent with our NASA policy.”
Shinn later discussed how NASA obtains federal funding, describing the importance and flow of NASA’s funding through the federal government.
“Now what matters are two things. One is we don’t spend any money that’s not appropriated for this agency. And then how it gets there is really a testimony to the efficiency of our government. But, again, we cannot perform any work without appropriated funds.”
Scale or fail: Practical advice to help you succeed
Michael Mineiro — senior counsel at Akin, a global law firm — presented his advice on how to effectively lobby or petition a government official. He emphasized the importance of understanding an official’s perspective.
“You need to petition from the perspective of the government official and within the scope of their duties and responsibilities,” said Mineiro. “Easy to say, hard to do. That requires you to really understand who you’re talking to and where they are in the U.S. government.”
Mineiro advised companies to work with nonprofits, coalitions and trade associations when petitioning government officials to bolster the legitimacy of their petition; to think holistically about how their petition might be perceived; and to understand the nuances of how government offices decide which petitions to take under consideration.
When working with congressional offices, Mineiro said building relationships with the district office where a company is headquartered is key.
“Start with where you’re headquartered and get to know everyone in your delegation, including the senators, and then begin to identify — either through jobs that you have in other districts, through contracts you’ve led, through agencies you serve or through public policy issues you address — other members and their districts in Congress that care about what you’re doing,” he said.
When asked about implementing this strategy for small companies, Mineiro advised that small businesses get to know their local offices rather than lobbying in Washington, D.C., and work with trade associations to get more information.
Mineiro ended with cautions for companies in the space industry interested in working with the federal government: “It’s going to take you longer than you think. I’ll repeat that. If the government’s your customer, it’s going to take you longer than you think. If the government’s your regulator, it’s going to take you longer than you think. Plan for that.”
The space economy and the fifth industrial revolution
As the final speaker, George Pullen, chief economist of the MilkyWayEconomy, discussed the future of the space industry. Because of the funding that the government has to put toward space projects, he emphasized the importance of working with the federal government.
“The U.S. government spends more money on space than all of the venture capitalists and private people put together,” said Pullen. “And that’s why, remember, it is a long game in space.”
The ACSP provides continuing education to professionals in the commercial space industry and recognizes competence through examination and credentialing. The ACSP’s flagship credential is the Commercial Space Regulatory Professional, which started in March 2023. To learn more about ASCP and its upcoming events, please visit www.acsp.space for more information.
Written by Hager Sharp
More Science and technology
ASU professor honored with prestigious award for being a cybersecurity trailblazer
At first, he thought it was a drill.On Sept. 11, 2001, Gail-Joon Ahn sat in a conference room in Fort Meade, Maryland.…
Training stellar students to secure semiconductors
In the wetlands of King’s Bay, Georgia, the sail of a nuclear-powered Trident II Submarine laden with sophisticated computer…
ASU startup Crystal Sonic wins Natcast pitch competition
Crystal Sonic, an Arizona State University startup, won first place and $25,000 at the 2024 Natcast Startup Pitch Competition at…